Peer Review Process

Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan (JPHH) utilizes an online submission and review system. All article submissions and peer reviews must be managed through this system, in accordance with the following Peer Review Policy.

- The Editorial Board is responsible for selecting papers and assigning reviewers.
Each article is typically reviewed by at least two independent reviewers.
Reviewers are unaware of the authors' identities, and authors do not know the identities of the reviewers (double-blind review).
- The review process will evaluate novelty, objectivity, methodology, scientific impact, conclusions, and references.
- The final decision on manuscript acceptance will be made by the Editorial Board, based on the reviewers' critical comments.
- The Section Editor will communicate the final decision regarding the submission to the corresponding author, following the reviewers' recommendations.
- The Editorial Board is committed to maintaining the confidentiality of all materials submitted to the journal and all communications with reviewers.

The full Peer Review Policy can be found here.

The overall Guidelines for Reviewers, including the checklist, can be found here.