KETAHANAN ALAMI JENIS-JENIS BAMBU YANG TUMBUH DI INDONESIA TERHADAP RAYAP TANAH (Coptotermes curvignathus Holmgren)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Natural durability of each bamboo species is different, thus information on natural durability of bamboo species is important for its utilization. This paper investigates the natural resistance of bamboo species against subterranean termites as a basis for species classification. Twenty species of bamboo from various regions in Indonesia (West Java, Banten, the Central of Java, Lampung and Bogor Botanical Garden) were tested against subterranean termites Coptotermes curvignathus Holmgren according to SNI 7204-2014. Parameters observed were weight loss percentage of bamboo, survival rate of the termites and degree of attack (subjectively). Results showed that based on the weight loss, three bamboo species could be grouped into resistance class I, five species into class II, three species into class III, seven species as class IV and two species as class V. Based on the survival rate of the termites, one of the bamboo species was classified in class I, four species in class II, one species in class III, 11 species in class IV, and three species in class V. Furthermore, according to the degree of attack, four species were heavily damaged, while 16 species showed moderately damage. From the result, it can be concluded that one species of bamboo namely apus (Gigantochloa apus) has the highest resistance class (class I), and four other species of bamboo namely hitam (G. atroviolacea), kuring (G. kuring), india/tulda (Bambusa tulda) and lemang (Schizostachyum brachycladum), were classified in resistance class II. In the utlization, the five species of bamboo can be used without preservation, while the remaining 15 species of bamboo in resistance class III V should be preserved before using.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Technology, 3(9), 937-962. Retrieved from http://www.ejournalofscience.org
Jasni, Pari, G., & Kalima, T. (2016). Komposisi kimia dan ketahanan 12 jenis rotan dari Papua terhadap bubuk kayu kering dan bangunan gedung. Papua terhadap bubuk kayu kering dan rayap tanah.Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan,34(1), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.20886/jphh.2016.34.1.33-43.
Jasni, & Roliadi, H. (2010). Daya tahan 25 jenis rotan terhadap rayap tanah. Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan, 28(1), 55-65.
Jasni, & Rulliaty, S. (2015). Ketahanan 20 jenis kayu terhadap serangan rayap tanah (Coptotermes curvignathus Holmgren) dan rayap kayu kering (Cryptotermes cynocephalus Light). Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan, 33(2), 125-133.
Jasni, Damayanti, R., & Sulastiningsih, I.M. (2017). Pengklasifikasian ketahanan 20 jenis bambu terhadap rayap kayu kering. Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan, 35(3), 171-183.
JitKaur, P., Satya, S., Pant, K., & Naik, S. (2015). Eco-friendly preservative treated bamboo culm: Compressive strength analysis. International Journal of Chemical, Molecular, Nuclear, Materials and Metallurgical Engineering, 9(1), 43-46.
Limi, Z. (2014). Keawetan alami kayu tumih (Combretocarpus rotundatus Miq Dancer.) dari serangan rayap kayu kering, rayap tanah dan jamur pelapuk kayu. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Loiwatu, M., & Manuhuwa, E. (2008). Komponen kimia dan anatomi tiga jenis bambu dari Seram, Maluku. AGRITECH, 18(2), 76-83.
Martawijaya, A. (1996). Petunjuk Teknis: Keawetan kayu dan faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Bogor: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hasil Hutan dan Sosial Ekonomi Kehutanan.
Mayasari, K., Yunus, M., & Daud, M. (2015). Efektivitas pengawet bambu untuk bahan material rumah apung Danau Tempe di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Permukiman, 10(2), 118-129.
Nandiaka, D., Y. Rismayadi & F. Diba (2003). Rayap. Biologi dan pengendaliannya. Surakarta:Muhammadiyah University Press.
Nandika, D. (2015). Satu abad perang melawan rayap. Mitigasi bahaya serangan rayap pada bangunan gedung.Workshop. Jakarta.Fakultas Kehutanan. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Nurkertamanda, D., Andrelina, W., & Widiani, M. (2011). Pemilihan parameter pre-treatment pada proses pengawetan bambu laminasi. J@TI Undip, VI(3), 155-160.
Ott, R. (1994). An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. Belmont, CA, USA: Duxburry Press.Purnamasari, I. (2013). Ketahanan oriented strand board bambu dengan perlakukan steam dan non steam terhadap serangan rayap dan kumbang bubuk (Skripsi Sarjana). Institut Pertanian Bogor.
SAS. (1997). SAS (Statistical Analysis System) guide for personal computers (Version 6). Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Sharma, P., Dhanwantri, K., & Mehta, S. (2014). Bamboo as a building material. International Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 5(3), 250-254. Retrieved from http://www.ripublication.com/ ijcer.htm.
Standar Nasional Indonesia (SNI). (2014). Uji ketahanan kayu terhadap organisme perusak kayu (SNI 7207-2014). Jakarta: Badan Standardisasi Nasional.
Steel, R., & Torrie, J. (1993). Prinsip dan prosedur statistika (Terjemahan). Yogyakarta: PT Gramedia.
Sumarni, G. (2004). Keawetan kayu terhadap serangga. Upaya menuju efesiensi penggunaan kayu. Orasi Pengukuhan Ahli Peneliti Utama. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kehutanan, Jakarta.
Sumarni, G., & Roliadi, H. (2001). Daya tahan 109 jenis kayu Indonesia terhadap rayap tanah (Coptotermes curvignathus Holmgreen). Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan, 20(3), 177-185.
Susilaning, L., & Suheryanto, D. (2012). Pengaruh waktu perendaman bambu dan penggunaan borak-borik terhadap tingkat keawetan bambu. Dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Sains & Technologi (SNAST) Periode III (pp. A94-A101). Yogyakarta.
Widjaja, E. (2011). The utilization of bamboo: At present and for the future. Dalam A. N. Gintings & N. Wijayanto (Eds.), Proceedings of Inter national Seminar Strategies and Challenges on Bamboo and Potential Non Timber Forest Products (NTFP) Management and Utilization (pp. 79-85).
Zulkarnaen, R. N., & Andila, P. S. (2015). Dendrocalamus spp.: Bambu raksasa koleksi Kebun Raya Bogor. Dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Masyarakat Biodiversitas Indonesia Vol. I No 3 (pp. 534-538).
