ARKEOLOGI, PUBLIK, DAN MEDIA SOSIAL DI MALUKU
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Social media has become a tool that links almost all aspects of human life, from the technology of information to the cultural segment where archaeology is part of it. For more than two decades, social media not only has become an informal place to encounter and exchange of ideas but also holds important role to share about archeological knowledge to the public in Maluku. This paper attempts to observe the correlation between archaeology and social media to support the effort of expanding the archaological knowledge and cultural history in Maluku. The method used in this research is literature study. The results of the study indicates that social media has become one of the main agents in the publication of archaeological knowledge in Maluku and is very prospective for further development.
Media sosial telah menjadi wahana yang bertautan dengan hampir seluruh aspek kehidupan manusia saat ini mulai dari ranah teknologi informasi hingga segmen kebudayaan, termasuk di dalamnya disiplin arkeologi. Sudah lebih dari dua dekade media sosial tidak saja menjadi ruang informal perjumpaan dan pertukaran gagasan, tetapi telah menjelma menjadi motor efektif yang turut menggerakkan dinamika akademis disiplin arkeologi, termasuk menjadi agen bagi interaksi arkeologi dan masyarakat. Media sosial berperan sebagai salah satu ruang paling efektif dalam meluaskan pengetahuan arkeologi bagi publik juga masuk di Maluku. Makalah ini mencoba mengamati hubungan disiplin arkeologi dan media sosial bagi perluasan pengetahuan arkeologi dan sejarah budaya untuk masyarakat di Maluku. Metode yang digunakan adalah kajian pustaka. Hasil studi menemukan bahwa media sosial telah menjadi salah satu agen utama dalam publikasi pengetahuan arkeologi di Maluku dan prospektif untuk terus dikembangkan ke depan.
Article Details
This work is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Authors whose articles are getting published must agree with the following rules:
- Publication rights for all contents published in Kalpataru Journal (printed and online versions) belong to The Board of Directors with acknowledgment of the authors (morale right still belongs to the author)
- Legal formal regulation for digital access to electronic journal follows the rule of Creative Commons license Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), which means Kalpataru Journal is a non-commercial publication, holds the right to keep, format, and manage the articles into the database, maintain, and publish articles
- Published articles both in printed and online versions are accessible for all purposes of education, research, and library archives. The board of directors is not responsible for any violations of the copyrights outside those purposes.
References
Boast, R., and P. Biehl. 2011. “Archaeological Knowledge Production and Dissemination in the Digital Age.” Dalam Archaeology 2.0: New Approaches to Communication and Collaboration, edited by E.C. Kansa, S.W. Kansa, and E. Watrall, 119–155. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press.
Clack, T., and M. Brittain. 2007. Archaeology and the Media. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Cleere, Henry. 1984. “World Cultural Resource Management: Problems and Perspectives.” Dalam Approaches to the Archaeological Heritage: A Comparative Study of World Cultural Resource Management System, edited by Henry Cleere, 128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Henson, D. 2013. “Digital Media and Public Engagement in Archaeology: An Opinion Piece.” Archäologische Informationen 36: 13–20.
Holtorf, C. 2007. Archaeology Is a Brand: The Meaningof Archaeology in Contemporary Popular Culture. Oxford: Archaeopress.
Jameson, Jr., and H. John. 2000. “Public Interpretation, Education and Outreach: The Growing Predominance in American Archaeology.” Dalam Cultural Resource Management in Contemporary Society: Perspective on Managing and Presenting the Past, edited by Francis McManamon and Alf. Hatton, 288. London: Routledge.
Lape, Peter Van. 2000. “Contact and Conflict in the Banda Islands, Eastern Indonesia, 11th-17th Centuries.” Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Brown University. Rhode Island.
Morrison, M. 2014. “Social Media and Professional Archaeology in Retrospect.” http://mickmorrison. com/2014/10/13/social-media-and-archaeology-reflections-from-a-jaded-professional/.
Moser, S. 2001. “Archaeological Representation: The Visual Conventions for Constructing Knowledge about the Past.” Dalam Archaeological Theory Today., edited by Ian Hodder. Cambridge: Polity Press.
O’Connor, S., M. Spriggs, and P. Veth. 2005. “The Aru Island in Perspective.” In The Archaeology of the Aru Island, edited by O’Connor Sue et.al. Canberra: Pandanus Books.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. 2010. Undang Undang No 11 Tahun 2010 tentang Cagar Budaya. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. 2017. Undang Undang No 5 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemajuan Kebudayaan. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.
Piccini, A. 2010. “The Stuff of Dreams: Archaeology, Audience and Becoming Material.” Dalam Unquiet Pasts, edited by S. Koerner and I. Russell, 305–26. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
Piccini, A., and D. Henson. 2006. Survey of Heritage Television Viewing 2005-2006. York: Council for British Archaeology.
Ririmasse, Marlon NR. 2005. “Jejak dan Prospek Penelitian Arkeologi di Maluku.” Kapata Arkeologi 1 (1): 35–55.
---------.2010. Arkeologi Pulau-Pulau Terdepan di Maluku: Sebuah Tinjauan Awal. Kapata Arkeologi 6 (12) : 71-89
---------.2014. “Pengetahuan Arkeologi sebagai Muatan Lokal: Penerapannya di Maluku.” Kapata Arkeologi 10 (1): 13–22.
---------.2015. “Abad Baru Purbakala: Memilih Arah menentukan Peran Penelitian Arkeologi di Maluku.” Kapata Arkeologi 11 (2): 75–86.
Roder, J. 1938. Die Felsiber im Flussgebiet de Tala (Sud West Ceram). Paideuma, Vol. 1 pp. 19-28
Shanks, M., and C. Tilley. 1992. Re- Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Spriggs, Matthew. 1998. “Research Questions in Maluku Archaeology.” Cakalele 9: 43